on the ELF, the Green Scare, and so-called “eco-terrorism”
I just ran across an article that ran in Rolling Stone last year about ‘eco terrorism‘ and the ongoing campaign of terror by the feds that seeks to portray radicals who use property destruction as terrorists, and it pissed me off. a lot. now i’m normally not a particularly angry person – i realized as part of an anger management class i took some years back that anger is a choice and it’s not a choice that I make very often because it’s usually not particularly productive. Anger is a weapon. It feels good and it lends power and force, but it clouds the mind; and I realized a long time ago that my mind is one of the best things I’ve got going for me and I’m better off to avoid anything and everything that could cloud my judgment. Still, there are some situations where anger is the only honest response, and this is one of those times.
The backstory, for folks who aren’t already familiar with what’s been going on or who don’t want to read the linked article, is that the Bush administration has completely and utterly failed to do a damn thing to crack Al Queda, and after 8 years of a “war on terror” that just plain looks bad, so they’ve decided to classify people who use property destruction as a protest tactic as “terrorists” and thereby artificially inflate the number of “terrorist” suspects that they’ve apprehended. That helps the Bushies standing with the Law & Order types and lets them trumpet what a great job they’ve done keeping America safe while completely failing to actually make anyone at all safer, since the people they’re prosecuting as terrorists have never caused physical injury to anyone.
Whatever you may think about the effectiveness or strategical utility of property destruction, the fact is that the current policy of conflating it with terrorism is absurd. If we were to accept that the two acts are one in the same we must begin by re-writing our own history and denouncing the people of colonial boston who boarded british ships and threw the tea overboard as terrorists, the moral equivilants of the people who flew planes into the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001. And that’s just plain stupid.
Now personally, I’m not really down with the ELF, mostly because I don’t think burning down buildings is an effective way to combat capitalism, but also because as a propagandist i think it tends to be counter-productive. the shit they burn down just gets rebuilt with insurance money and the feds use the opportunity to paint us all as nutjobs. That said, I’ve spent enough time in forest actions and in anarchist circles over the years to know that i’ve met people who were actively involved in that movement. (And no, to the FBI agents reading this, I don’t know any of their real names and wouldn’t recognize them in a lineup. I have a horrible memory for faces and names and they wouldn’t have introduced themselves using their government names anyway. What I remember is ideas, thoughts, patterns, conversation, arguments. the important things.) What I can say with absolute confidence is that – with very few exceptions – the people who i’ve known who’ve been most passionate in their defense of property destruction as a means to combat capitalism have been motivated not by hatred, not by anger, but by a sincere and deep-rooted love for our planet, for our species, and for all of the other species that we share our planet with. They are not terrorists. they are not monsters. Just ordinay people who have the good sense to realize that the damage being done to our planet is irreversible and that if we want to have a future we have to act in the present by any and every means available to us. Failure to do so is a crime against humanity and a crime against earth. As V points out, it is the fact that we are willing and able to stand up for each other and for our planet that makes us human, and our failure (as a culture) to do so is an affront to our own humanity. So while I may not be a huge fan of the ELF, I think it’s pretty ridiculous that it’s is radicals who stand up for the planet who are treated like criminals and not the evil bastards who are driving us all to the brink of extinction. As far as I’m concerned, that fact says everything that needs to be said about the sheer maniacal stupidity of Capitalism, the State, and – particularly – of this government.
It is a symptom of the peculiar insanity that is state power that these people – like so many generations of radicals before – are portrayed as “terrorists” and hunted down. Think on this for a second – Israeli tanks can buldoze entire villages and destroy olive trees that take a century to mature – stealing food from the mouths of Palestinian generations yet unborn – but no corporate media outlet or government would dare to call that “terrorism”. American troops can level an entire city – Falujah – and no one calls it “terrorism”. Chinese troops can kill with impunity in Tibet, Russian troops can do the same in Chechnya, but even those nations fiercest State critics refuse to call it terrorism. The CIA can even fund, arm, and train self-described terrorists all over the world, but virtually no one in the mainstream media or political establishments will openly admit that our government is the biggest sponsor of terrorism on the planet. But a group of young people who recognize the pure insanity of our cultures suicidal and ecocidal assault on all life and take a few small, largely symbolic, acts to fight it by lighting fires in the dark and destroying buildings that should not exist in the first place – harming no one – are called terrorists.
Given a choice between standing with them and standing with the Empire, I’ll side with the kids with matches every time.
A few thoughts on where The Family fucked up and how the larger Anarchist movement can learn from this and grow:
1 – If you’re going to be involved in direct action, *especially* the kind of Direct action that potentially carries long prison sentences, DON’T USE DRUGS and don’t work with anyone who does. It’s not a coincidence that the asshole informant who gave the feds their first break and allowed them to crack the Family (the affinity group they infiltrated and arrested in Operation Backfire, in the Rolling Stone article) was a heroine junky. The cops didn’t have anything on him but the fact that his name had been mentioned and he was an addict, and that’s all it took. Don’t work with people like that and don’t work with anyone who does. Addicts can’t handle their shit, if they could they wouldn’t be addicts. So don’t trust them to handle your shit. Period. The cops are not our friends and there’s no reason in the world to give them extra leverage.
2 – If you’re going to do direct actions – legal or otherwise – keep your affinity group small. 4-6 is ideal, more then 12 is almost always unworkable. If you find your group growing larger then that as new people are brought in, split the group in two and go your separate ways.
3 – Security Culture. There are a lot of good pamphlets on this so I’m not going to write one here.
4 – Consider risk and costs/benefits of every action carefully. Understand that you will be treated as a terrorist if caught destroying property and that if/when that happens your life will functionally be over. That’s a lot to risk. Don’t risk it doing stupid shit. Jeff Luers threw away his life to burn 3 SUV’s. I met him once, we caught a ride back from Oregon to California together, and he was one of the most articulate and thoughtful people I’ve ever met. We disagreed on a lot of things, then and now, but I respected him then and I respect him now for his commitment to the struggle that we’re all in. But the fact is, burning 3 cars in a car lot doesn’t do a damn thing to stop capitalism or the destruction of the earth. Burning an entire dealership, like the Family did the night before his sentencing, didn’t do a damn thing either. I’m not going to tell anyone else what is or isn’t a valid means of protest, but I would say that if you’re going to take action you need to select your targets and your tactics very very carefully.
5 – Everything is propaganda. Every fire that’s lit, every song that’s sung, every protest, every rally, every action. We are in a culture war here, a 24/7 struggle for the “hearts and minds” of our fellow humans. Don’t dehumanize them and treat them like they’re stupid. They’re not. They just have different priorities then us, priorities that make sense to them. Our only chance to win is to convince our friends, neighbors, and complete strangers reading articles written by people who hate us on the other side of the world that we are right and that they need to join the movement. Don’t do stupid shit that will turn people off to the movement for no good reason. Costs and benefits.
6 – Everyone is a potential ally. One of the biggest turning points in the Irish war for independence came when Michael Collins convinced Ned Brigh – the British agent assigned to watch him – to become a double agent and help him infiltrate and undermine the British intelligence network. Everyone is a potential ally.
7 – The opposite is also true. Everyone is a potential enemy. Lovers, friends, housemates, even that cute girl you might at the G8 Protest (and another article on the same story, can you say “entrapment”?). The Feds were finally able to crack the Family because they were able to strong-arm people into informing on each other. IF you’re going to be involved in underground actions that carry the risk of prison time or worse, the best way to make sure no one can rat you out is to make sure no one knows. If you can’t keep your mouth shut you’ve got no business doing things that could land you or the people you care about in jail. And remember, the feds don’t just arrest and murder people for things they actually did. Ask Sacco & Vanzetti or the Haymarket martyrs about that. So don’t give them any excuses.
8 – Understand that militant rhetoric won’t win a revolution. Don’t talk about guns and violence in your manifestos if you don’t honestly believe that we’re in a position to win an armed revolution. All you do is legitimize the State using their real guns and real violence to come thundering down on all of us. The last couple of ELF communiques cited in the Rolling Stone article talk about picking up the gun and fighting a violent revolution. There’s a good chance Rolling Stone made that shit up, but there’s also a damn good chance they didn’t. I’ve been an Anarchist for over a decade and spent a lot of time in what passes for a movement in North America. We’re champion shit talkers when it comes to militant rhetoric, but the fact is very very few of us even know how to use a gun and even fewer actually own one. As a movement we need to check ourselves and stop writing manifestos that we can’t live up too. We don’t need to declare ourselves pacifists or anything, but we do need to stop giving the pigs excuses to hunt, cage, and kill us.
We are in a very early stage of building a revolutionary movement in north America right now. At this point we need to get our ideas out and build our organizations and networks to the point where we can influence events in the real world and mobilize large numbers of people. If and when the time is right for armed revolution (and I think it’s entirely possible to get at least most of the way to where we want to go without having to kill anyone) we won’t need to convince the larger populace of that fact. Most people aren’t really opposed to violence, if they were it’d be impossible for the worlds armies to recruit. They’re opposed to violence against them and are more then willing to use violence to fight back against anyone and everyone that threatens them and their families. At the point where the working class majority realizes that the State is a far bigger threat to them then Anarchists are, they’ll side with us against the State. In the meantime, making threats we can’t back up actually hurts us by making us look like the bigger threat and allowing the pigs to paint us as terrorists. History shows very clearly that revolutionary movements that talk militant when they don’t have military capacity get killed off early. And we can’t afford to lose again, if only because our planet cannot survive another century of Capitalism.
9 – We don’t have to like each other. We don’t have to agree. But we do have to work together. There are a few common principles that bind our movement together: opposition to hierarchy, mutual aid, solidarity, class struggle, environmentalism, feminism, anti-racism, and the drive to empower local communities at the expense of the State. That’s more in common then Democrats or Republicans have, and more then enough to build a movement on. We CAN win, it is possible. But as long as we sit around and talk shit about each other instead of organizing it’ll never happen. Let’s put down our squabbles over the relatively trivial details that divide us and start building.
10 – Most of that building needs to be above-ground and overt. Our neighbors and friends need to see Anarchists and Anarchist organizations doing positive things in the community and treating the people around them with respect and solidarity. We have a reputation as being anti-social and violent that is not entirely our fault, but that – in all honesty – our movement has done a lot to legitimize. Putting molatov cocktails on our fliers may well make some of us feel radical and cool, but it definitely is a turn off to Jane Average who would agree with our politics if she understood what they actually are but is sure as hell not going to put her family at risk by hanging our with a bunch of terrorists. This goes back to point 8 but also goes beyond it. The best way to disprove popular preconceptions about Anarchists advocating chaos is to be organized, active, friendly, accessible, and visible. When people see organized anarchists doing positive things in their communities they get curious and come to us. That’s how movements grow. And that’s how we’ll win.
oh and one last thing (call this point 11) support our political prisoners!
Erick McDavid – http://www.supporteric.org/
Jeff Luers – http://www.freefreenow.org/
The Anarchist Black Cross Federation: Providing support and solidarity to Anarchist political prisoners worldwide: http://www.abcf.net/
Info on the Green Scare & the larger crackdown on so-called “eco-terrorism”: http://greenscare.org/
Posted: June 3rd, 2008 under culture war, ecology.
Comments: 5
Comments
Comment from Son of the Allfather
Time: June 3, 2008, 9:53 am
Now I apologize because I haven’t had enough time to read the whole article yet. I am looking forward to doing so when I get back from my morning run.
But just from a quick scan of your title and section about ELF members not being terrorists, I just thought Id throw in my 2 cents. I am not agreeing or disagreeing. Before you judge me know that I am a pagan, ex catholic. I have seen the beauty of the earth and majestic spirit of it. I respect and love nature, and I personally feel that humanity is simply cancer on this beautiful planet. Due to the fact of civilization, monotheism, and capitalism we are destroying the planet. If we had stayed in a hunter gatherer lifestyle of old, I feel we would be much better off in our relationship with nature.
But from my understanding and from what I have read in dictionaries, a terrorist is anyone who imposes harm/fear on others. Someone who uses terror as a form of coercion. Terror being violent or destructive acts (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands.
Although it may not be seen as terror in their eyes, but to the peoples whose homes/families that they may impact, it is terror. If they burned down my home it would be terror, even though I love the earth and wish humanity would right its wrongs it is still nonetheless destruction to my property. By definition what they are doing is terrorism, as a personal opinion it may not be. I’m all for society to stop destroying the planet, but do so in another manner, burn your own homes, not others. Peacefully protest, educate people, and do not resort to violence. You gather much more support if you can peacefully make a change, rather than gathering more opposition, because people who may have supported you, do not agree with your means of operation.
Comment from Andy
Time: June 3, 2008, 1:53 pm
Apparently I have to put my info in all over again. I think it’s because I’m using Firefox. Anyway, you can probably check my IP address to make sure it’s me and not “Anna.”
Anywho, onto my thoughts on this entry.
You post at a lot of places, right? Probably places that are more explicitly anarchist than a stand-alone blog, right? I’ll just assume “Yes” and continue.
It’s nice to see things from the inside, but if it’s true what you say about the Feds, then it’s very plausible that they are reading this blog and are thinking of ways to disrupt these movements. You mentioned as much near the beginning, talking to whichever agents may be reading.
With all that in mind, was it smart to make this public? If you can’t choose whether or not an entry is public or private, then maybe you just shouldn’t post it here. Actually, come to think of it, there’s no such thing as “friends” on this blog, are there? Then I guess all entries are automatically public.
I guess a decent counterargument would be that, even if this stuff were private, the FBI (or whoever else) would find some way to read it anyway if they really thought it was important.
Do you view cops as victims of government too? I think Zinn hinted at this in “A People’s History of the United States,” but I can’t remember. It’s been too long, I suppose.
I guess that you mostly focus on the anarchist movement on the west coast, but what do you think about the anarchist movement in general (meaning the United States)? I’ll make that question a little more specific.
OK, I found a picture that precedes my next question very nicely: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/S24_Black_Bloc_1.jpg
These are “anarchists” from the anti-war protest on 9/24/2007 in Washington, D.C. (I’ll actually be going there in a week or so, should be very interesting.) Anyway, when I saw this picture while reading through a bunch of anti-Iraq War stuff, I immediately thought of the “anarchists” (read: middle-class goths) from my high school that I used to hang out with. It seems that these types have labeled themselves “anarchists” because their parents don’t like it, and it’s naturally going to cause problems in the household. Is this an actual problem (kids showing up that don’t know anything), or am I just not “in the know”? That big banner seems to read “RECLAIM DEMOCRACY,” so maybe they actually know what they are talking about. Apparently anarchists tend to cover up their faces to avoid being spotted, so perhaps I am wrong after all.
Do you think that things are “better” for anarchists nowadays? I mean, back in the Haymarket days, the cops could just round up some “bomb-throwing anarchists” and nobody would bother questioning it. But nowadays you’ve got Chomsky, Zinn (who apparently live pretty close to each other), and whole slew of other “Ivory Tower” anarchists who can’t be blacklisted as easily as the average anarchist, and these middle to upper-class anarchists tend to very local in defending the lower-class dudes who usually get in trouble. Organizations like the NAACP have a legal defense fund that people can donate to so they have good legal representation instead of just crappy “public defenders” who don’t know your name. Is there some kind of “legal defense fund” for anarchists?
Obviously I would never mean “better” in the sense that their goals are more reachable than they have been in past, however.
Comment from lynx
Time: June 3, 2008, 10:35 pm
andy – you could be a cop, you could not be a cop. I don’t know, but I figure I might as well take you at your word. Writing isn’t illegal (yet) so there’s no reason for me to restrict who can see this, or any other post. The point is to get ideas out as widely as possible. restricting who can see what I write doesn’t serve that goal. The feds already know who I am and have a file on me, i’m an independent anarchist musician with 6 self-released albums and i’ve appeared on compilations and mixtapes all over the planet. if they don’t have a file on me they’re not doing they’re jobs very well. But I’m not going to let that intimidate me or stop me.
re: your question about punk kids who like to smash things showing up and calling themselves anarchists, yeah, it’s a problem. It’s a feedback loop, really. the media drones on about anarchists bent on chaos and destruction, so anti-social kids with anger issues who actually do want to break shit and aren’t at all interested in actual anarchism start calling themselves anarchists, which in turn feeds the media buzz. and it’s a big problem when your trying to do actual organizing as an anarchist and throw events, only to have a bunch of dumb kids show up, trash the venue, draw graffiti all over the place, and piss off the people who made their space available. Thankfully that doesn’t happen very often , but I have had venues refuse to let me throw events because it’s happened to them in the past. i think the solution is to reach out to those kids and educate them as to what anarchism really is. some of them will decide they’re not interested and piss off, but some of them will dedicate themselves to the cause become solid revolutionaries for life. hell, i started out as an angry kid myself. just look at my first album cover. anger is completely normal. If the state of the world doesn’t piss you off you’re not paying enough attention, but if we want to get anywhere we’ve got to move beyond anger and start building for the future. as for whether any of that applies to the kids in your picture, i don’t know. Maybe, maybe not. I’d have to talk to them and get to know them as people instead of just looking at a random photo to make that kind of judgment.
covering your face at protests is a good idea if you don’t want the cops to be able to ID you from photos, regardless of your political ideology.
sure cops are victims too. everybody is a victim. so what? they’re still responsible for their actions. Personally, I don’t buy the typical lefty “it’s all society’s fault! i’m not responsible!” crap. If we excuse people from responsibility for their own actions we might as well pack it in and all go home because nothing is going to change. Revolutions happen when people take responsibility for themselves and their communities and take action to make things better.
re: are things better now – yes and no. mostly no. but that’s a topic for another post, i don’t want to do an in depth comparative analysis of the anarchist movement at the turn of the last century compared to now in a comment.
Son – the standard definition is that violence to intimidate and coerce people for political gain = terrorism. that’s not the definition that’s actually used in political discourse, however; if it was then every government on the planet would have to be classified as a terrorist organization since every single one of them uses violence for political gain. which was part of the point i was trying to make in paragraph 5. In any case, the ELF has never killed anyone, and their targets tend to be government and corporate institutions. They’re not firebombing people’s houses. Which is why i think it’s so ridiculous to overtly conflate them with Al Queda and other organization that commit mass murder on a regular basis.
In any case, the point of the post wasn’t to defend their tactics – you’ll notice I explicitly said I don’t think they’re tactics are very effective – it was to say that all the government propaganda about what a big ‘terrorist threat’ they represent is ridiculously overblown. Eric McDavid was sentenced to 20 years in jail for hanging out with his friends, smoking pot, talking shit, and completely failing to ever actually build a bomb. That’s just stupid. It’s even more outrageous that members of The Family who are accused of keeping watch while someone else set a fire that harmed no one are facing multiple life sentences, meanwhile no one but no one is willing to even consider filing formal charges against our Butcher in Chief for starting an illegal war that’s killed over 4,000 americans and uncounted iraqi’s.
I don’t have to agree with the ELF’s tactics to know that that’s fucked up.
Comment from Star Sailor Cat
Time: June 4, 2008, 6:53 am
Hiya
I’m out of touch with all this stuff that you write about.
Just know that I stand with you,I’ve felt proud of you for some years now.
I know you are not any kind of terrorist, you stand for the good of this planet. I know you would not do harm to any creature on this planet human or animal.
Black Sheep rule! LOL
Comment from Andy
Time: June 5, 2008, 4:01 pm
As long as you’re willing to answer questions, I don’t particularly mind if you think I’m a cop, or not.
Basically, I’m just asking questions. I’m not really trying to “push” anything on you, I’d just like to get your thoughts. Sorry if I seem “pushy.”



Write a comment