the universe according to lynx
So i’ve been thinking about religion, gods, spirituality a lot lately, as readers of this blog can probably tell. I’ve arrived at a few basic conclusions about what i believe, and while i don’t expect to make any converts i figured laying it out on the record so to speak might be useful for folks trying to figure out what the hell i’m on about when i rant about how stupid i think christianity, islam, judaism, and other revealed religions are.
In a nutshell, I’ve come to the conclusion that I do not know the ultimate nature of reality and that anyone who claims they do is probably a liar. Based on that it’s a pretty short step to assert that all of the religions founded by those liars are not true. The universe is a very big place with a virtually infinite number of worlds. As everyone with even a basic grasp of statistics knows, infinite worlds mean infinite chances for life to evolve, and therefore an infinite diversity in that life. In such an infinitely diverse universe, the Abrahamic idea of an anthropomorphic God who is peculiarly devoted to one particular species on one tiny little planet and who created that species (humans) in “his” image is utterly absurd. It’s even more absurd to suggest that any god capable of creating the universe would be interested in dictating and enforcing morality among humans on this tiny blue dot we call earth. Based on that we can pretty much rule out the Abrahamic conception of a personified creator deity. Without a giant Santa Claus to promise us toys, virgins, and eternal life after death, the Christian and Muslim concepts of Heaven and Hell are obviously irrelevant as well, and these religions become relevant only for what they can tell us about techniques of population control in the feudal societies where these religions originated and how those methods have been adapted by the ruling classes in the modern world.
The question then becomes does divinity exist? and if so what is the nature of that divinity?
Having eliminated prophets and revelations along with the anthropomorphic gods they sell, we don’t have any quick and easy method of establishing what the nature of divinity is. The only honest response has got to be that no one knows for certain, but that some things are more probable then others.
Over the years I’ve looked at a lot of belief systems. I like the Buddhist idea of mutual co-creation, that we all created each other through a collective act of belief, but I very much dislike the Buddhist contention that the universe is an illusion we must transcend. Reincarnation also seems fairly unlikely to me on the basis that there are more people alive now then in all of prior human history combined, so if the universe is just recycling souls then there obviously wouldn’t be enough to go around. Which would actually go a long way to explain modern corporate Capitalism, but still seems unlikely. I also like the non-dualistic Hindu idea that all of the universe is in fact divine, that all life – including the gods – are manifestations of the same divine reality, and that the universe and deity are essentially synonymous. The Caste system and the emphasis on escaping this earth and this existence through meditation in order to transcend reality pretty much kills Hinduism for me though. I also really like the way many Pagans show a profound love and respect for nature and this earth – which, after all, is the only world we have – but I’m wary of the tendency among many Pagans to first reject the Abrahamic ideas of personified anthropomorphic deities and then turn around and attempt to resurrect the anthropomorphic deities of other religious traditions. Goddess worship doesn’t really do much for me, it replaces a patriarchy with a matriarchy but leaves all of the fundamental problems with personified deities intact.
or me at least – speaking only for myself and with no claims or pretensions towards religious authority of any kind – this earth is the only heaven I need or want and I would rather live one life according to my own conscience and without fear then be endlessly re-incarnated or sent to heaven or hell as a reward/punishment for failing to comply with someone else’s morality. The only thing I can think of that’s really worth worshiping is nature itself on a universal scale. And even that would be less a matter of “worship” then of showing respect. To me the very act of worship – of giving away ones power to a projection of deity that may or may not exist – is dehumanizing at best. Also, if nature is divine I wouldn’t expect that divinity to have the kind of individual self-aware consciousness that humans have, it would be a networked consciousness similar to the Internet only infinitely more complex- where the total consciousness is the result of the interactions between all of the beings who are a part of it. It would be similar to the Buddhist idea of mutual co-creation but it would involve every aspect of the universe as a whole – not just “sentient” beings – and it would be happening constantly as the universe as a whole created and recreated itself from one moment to the next.
The closest word I’ve found to describe that sort of belief system is Pantheism, but i could also call myself an agnostic (because I don’t claim to know if my own conception of divinity is ultimately true) or an atheist (because I believe that religions based around personified deities are definitely not true). In the past i’ve gone so far as to self-identify as a Pagan based on the idea that paganism = nature worship, but if paganism = worshiping nature-identified deities and not nature itself then I’d have to count myself out. i guess it all depends on where we draw the boundaries. I try not to get too hung up on labels anyway, I’ve got enough labels already from my political activism without attaching more to myself.
At the end of the day the thing i find most intriguing about spirituality is that – like the universe itself – it’s both infinitely complicated and utterly simple. There is no god, no savior, no sin, no redemption, no afterlife; only us and the universe we live in. And if we want to continue living in this particular corner of the universe it’d be a good idea to start taking care of it.
Posted: June 30th, 2007 under gods & religion, personal.
Comments: 5
Comments
Comment from Luke
Time: July 1, 2007, 5:13 am
Interesting. What you are saying makes a lot of sense? Though I think there are a lot of indigenous traditions where the landscape or elements of the landscape have personality. Is it the singular-ness of personalized deity that you find unlikely, or the anthropomorphisation.
Your post also made me recall in the Discworld novels, Terry Pratchett’s description of Death as an anthropomorphic personification, I think used in a similar way of mutual co-creation.
L
Comment from lynx
Time: July 1, 2007, 3:02 pm
Terry Pratchet rocks.
it’s the part where people project human characteristics onto non-human entities that strikes me as dumb.
It totally makes sense to me that a mountain or a river or grove of trees (for instance) would have its own energy, a collective consciousness rising out of all the living things in that particular local ecosystem. Anyone who’s spent time in nature and really stopped and listened should know what i mean. it’s very Shinto, really… It also seems pretty obvious to me that that’s where the idea of local deities originated from. Even cities have their own energies, produced by all the people who live and die in them. New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, London, Dublin, Mexico City are all very different places – each city has its own personality, so to speak. That’s an example of the kind of collective consciousness that I’m talking about. Writ large, that type of collective intelligence would fit my conception of deity pretty well.
And of course, if string theory is correct then matter is just sub-atomic vibrations, distinctions between individuals literally do not exist, and we are all manifestations of the same universal entity. What we have to remember is that such an entity would not be human and there’s no reason to expect it to have human characteristics, be self-aware, or be at all interested interested in human affairs. To expect deity to care about our personal lives is beyond egotistical, it’s downright insane.
again, just my 2 cents.
Comment from Star Sailor Cat
Time: August 20, 2007, 7:09 am
Pantheism, I relate to beauty of it …being one with everything.
Religion is a very personal thing and I get secretly angry with people who push what they belive on to the rest of us.
We all have our own personalitys and I think we are drawn to what suits us.
There is a system some folks belive in about soul age and the number of times we reincarnate, I’m not sure about this but it does make a little bit of sense to me.
I think too that *god* is nothing at all like the christians try to knock into our heads.
I belive in love and think that even the vilest of humans are welcomed home like a prodical son.
Who knows LOL
Lynx, you have some very good thoughts that I can relate too.
love jackie
x x
Comment from Love Actually Soundtrack
Time: October 13, 2007, 7:07 pm
Hi…Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts..what a nice Saturday
Comment from Cliff
Time: April 21, 2009, 1:39 am
Your insights are very refreshing. I am very studious of the various religions of the world and have a similar perspective to you. If I were to give myself a label I would have to say I was a pantheist. I too have a disbelief in the major religions as they claim the divine to be attainable only from their source, which is a complete conflict of interest if you ever have something they want(be it physically or spiritually). I don’t think the afterlife(if such a thing exists) should really matter if you live life the way you want to. Personally, I wouldn’t mind oblivion as opposed to spending eternity with a bunch of disillusioned sycophants and power hungry tyrants. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts. Peace be with you!


Write a comment